Regional Ecosystem Office

P.O. Box 3623, 333 SW 1st, 
Portland, Oregon 97208
Phone: (503) 326-6265 FAX: (503) 326-6282

              Memorandum

Date:     May 11,1995

To:         Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Members (See distribution list)

From:     Donald R. Knowles, Executive Director

Subject:  May 1995 Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting Notes

Enclosed are the notes from the May 1995 Intergovernmental Advisory Committee meeting, and the following:

Page

• Executive Summary 4-5
• Detailed summary of each topic 6-13
• Draft agenda for June 14
• List of future agenda items 15
• List of the meeting handouts 16
• List of IAC meeting attendees 17

Our next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, June 1, at the Sheraton Portland Airport Hotel, and will begin at 9:00 a.m. The agenda review conference call for the June meeting will be on Wednesday, May 17, at 10:00 a.m. IAC members who wish to participate in the conference call, or have any questions or suggestions, can contact the appropriate agency representative, Gary S. Sims at (503) 326-6274, or Linda Kucera at (503) 326-6283.

Enclosures

cc:
REO
OFED

384/ly

Date: May 11, 1995
Subject: May 1995 Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting Notes

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Distribution List

California
Francie Sullivan, Shasta County Supervisor
Terry Gorton, Assistant Secretary, Forestry and Rural Economic Dev., California Resource Agency

Oregon
Rocky McVay, Curry County Commissioner
Paula Burgess, Federal Forest and Resource Policy Advisor, Office of the Governor

Washington
Harvey Wolden, Skagit County Commissioner
Amy F. Bell, Deputy Supervisor for Community Relations, WA Dept. of Natural Resources
Bob Nichols, Senior Executive Policy Assistant, Governor's Office (Alternate)

Tribes
Greg Blomstrom, Planning Forester, CA Indian Forest & Fire Mgmt. Council
Mel Moon, Commissioner, NW Indian Fisheries Commission
Jim Anderson, Executive Director, NW Indian Fisheries Commission (Alternate)
Gary Morishima, Technical Advisor, Intertribal Timber Council
Guy McMinds, Executive Office Advisor, Quinault Indian Nation

Federal Agencies
Michael Collopy, Director, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, National Biological Service
Anita Frankel, Director, Forest and Salmon Group, Environmental Protection Agency
Eugene Andreuccetti, Regional Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Bob Graham, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Alternate)
John Lowe, Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service, R-6
G. Lynn Sprague, Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service, R-5 (Alternate)
Thomas Murphy, Director, Environmental Research Laboratory, Environmental Protection Agency
Charles Philpot, Station Director, Forest Service, PNW
Stan Speaks, Area Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Ron Eggers, Assistant Area Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Alternate)
Michael Spear, Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
William Stelle, Jr., Regional Director, National Marine Fisheries Service
Jacqueline Wyland, Division Chief, Environ. & Tech. Services, National Marine Fisheries Service (Alternate)
Tom Tuchmann, Director, Office of Forestry and Economic Development (Ex Officio)
William Walters, Acting Regional Director, National Park Service
Elaine Zielinski, State Director, Bureau of Land Management, OR/WA
Ed Hastey, State Director, Bureau of Land Management, CA (Alternate)

Opening Comments by John Lowe

• Welcome all members, and the public, to the second IAC meeting.
• The first order of business is the certification of the May meeting minutes as correct. No changes were proposed or requested by any of the IAC members. The minutes for the March 1995 IAC meeting were certified by the chair as accurate.
• A large portion of the time today will be devoted to the revised watershed guide. Watershed analysis is one of the most important issues the committee will address--not only the technical aspects, but also the question of what it is and is not.

Revision of Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale: The Revised Federal Guide to Watershed Analysis (Guide)

• A policy group was formed, and a charter written, to address a variety of issues raised by committee members.
• Work on Guide domains and modules will be suspended until the June meeting, in order to concentrate on issues raised by the committee and to be addressed by the policy group.
• The WACT will continue to refine the six-step analysis process by incorporating the written comments already received.
• Federal agencies should continue to use the existing Federal Agency Guide to Pilot Watershed Analysis until further direction.
• Federal executives on the IAC reaffirmed their commitment to fully support the WACT and related staff requirements to complete the Guide.

Ecosystem Restoration/Jobs-in-the-Woods

• IAC members who serve on various CERTs may provide information concerning, and serve as a link with, the Economic Adjustment Initiative.
• The IAC will focus on the Jobs-in-the-Woods portion of the Economic Initiative as it pertains to the federal agencies responsible for its implementation.
• Chairs from provincial committees should be invited to future IAC meetings to make presentations concerning local issues and activities.

FACA

• The Department of Agriculture will determine which USDA-chartered advisory committees meet the requirements of the exemption language in the 1995 Unfunded Mandates Bill.
• The REO staff should review GSA rules on implementation of the exemption language to assess its impact on the IAC.

Research and Monitoring Committee Subcommittee

• The IAC approved the charter of the RMC subcommittee.
• The RMC will explore opportunities to hold meetings in different geographic locations in order to enhance participation opportunities.

Interorganizational Resource Information Coordinating Council Subcommittee

• The IAC approved the charter of the IRICC subcommittee, with identified wording changes.
• The State of California Resources Agency will be contacted concerning coordination of fire information systems with the IRICC.
• The IRICC and the RMC will ensure they have at least one member in common to coordinate and avoid duplication.
• County and tribal representatives will be contacted to obtain their nominations for the IRICC subcommittee.

Activity Information Sharing System

• Specific information components were identified.
• The information system will be developed using existing data from agencies. No new data will be requested.
• The first two priorities of the REO GIS staff are: Survey & Manage and Watershed Delineations. The Activity Information Sharing System is a third priority.

Hot Topics

• EPA Research raised a concern about work group participation in terms of people and time commitments. The question raised was: "Are the agencies willing to provide the support needed to meet previously agreed to schedules and fulfill their commitments to the work groups?"
• The federal agency members renewed their original commitment to work groups.
• The REO is to review work groups progress and provide updates as needed.

CHARTER

Group Name: Watershed Analysis Policy Group	May 5, 1995
Purpose: There is common agreement among Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC) members that the watershed analysis process must be implementable, add value, and result in timely analysis to support resource programs integral to the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP) implementation. The process must be responsive to the public, to agencies' management and regulatory needs, and meet expectations established in the NFP. However, there is a wide range of interpretations on how comprehensive a watershed analysis should be and still be able to meet these expectations. Prior to formation of the IAC, the Regional Interagency Executive Committee (RIEC) directed the interagency Watershed Analysis Coordination Team (WACT) to develop a watershed analysis guide that would meet these expectations within the framework of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the NFP. This policy group of the IAC is being established to provide an opportunity for IAC members to review the previous direction and provide input to the REO and WACT as they revise Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale: The Revised Federal Guide to Watershed Analysis (Guide).
Tasks: 1. Perform (or commission) a review of: a. The January 10, 1995, RIEC direction letter for consistency with the fundamental requirements of the ROD. b. The ROD requirements for watershed analysis: when is it required and when is it not required. c. The basis for agency discretion to exempt "minor activities" from watershed analysis. (This may need to be put on a fast track, as it is a current problem for the agencies.) d. Authority in the ROD to have different levels of analysis (e.g., simple vs. complex). 2. If found consistent with the ROD, review the January 10 RIEC direction letter to the REO and WACT to: a. Identify policy issues of concern to IAC members. b. Agree on solutions for resolving the issues so that Guide revision can proceed. This review will include items such as: a. Clarify use of term "issues" in watershed analysis: Define "issues." Explain how "issues" affect watershed analysis priorities. Explain how "issues" affect the scope of analyses. b. Define options for levels of analysis: If there is discretion in the ROD, can the circumstances or activities that warrant different levels of analysis be defined? If there is discretion in the ROD, can certain minor activities be exempted from watershed analysis? If so, examples of such activities? c. Define options for minimum watershed analysis requirements/data: Minimum elements/analyses to characterize the watershed. Minimum analyses (including modules) to address management needs (e.g., ESA, riparian reserve changes, CWA, etc.). Minimum data standards. d. Clarify which agencies are expected to use the Guide and its relationship to nonfederal lands. 3. Review WACT recommendations for Guide revisions (easy fixes). Identify non-controversial items for action by the WACT.

Group Members: All IAC members (or their alternates) are invited to participate.

Statement of Success: The work group will be considered successful if it can agree on policies that are consistent with the ROD, that can be supported by IAC members, and that clarify existing direction to the REO and the WACT for revising the watershed analysis Guide so that watershed analysis is doable, yet still rigorous and ecosystem-focused.

Issue Summary from the May 1995 IAC Meeting
Meeting Date: May 4, 1995	REO Contact: Curt Loop/Ranotta McNair
Topic: Ecosystem Restoration/Jobs-in-the-Woods
Objective: Review the background paper on the Ecosystem Restoration/Jobs-in-the-Woods program. Agree on how the IAC will proceed with this issue.
Summary of Discussion/IAC Actions: Following the presentation of the background paper on the Economic Initiatives, Terry Gorton, State of California representative, stated that she had just attended a meeting of the chairpersons of the three State CERTs. Their next meeting is scheduled for May 23, 1995. Ms. Gorton agreed to brief the committee on the results of the meeting, which may help identify future issues to pursue and what the IAC focus should be. Some IAC members indicated that there is some frustration at the local level due to the apparent lack of opportunity to influence how money is spent. Committee members representing federal agencies indicated that there may be a difference in the way states and federal agencies measure success. Federal agencies often measure success by identifying how much money is injected into the community; whereas, the states often view success as providing (long-term) employment to displaced timber workers. The committee suggested they invite a province chairperson to give a presentation on field activities, at a future meeting.
IAC Agreements: The IAC indicated that members who serve on various CERTs may provide sufficient information for the committee concerning the Economic Adjustment Initiative. Further, IAC members, and REO Staff, working with the CERTs may provide the needed liaison and linkage between the forest resources and economic development organizations (i.e., the IAC and the CERTs). The IAC will focus on the Jobs-in-the-Woods portion of the Economic Adjustment Initiative as it pertains to the federal agencies responsible for the implementation of the program (FS, BLM, FWS, BIA, & EPA).
RIEC Decisions: NA
Follow-up Actions (who/what/when): The REO will schedule a province chairperson to present a status report of actions and issues at the province level.

Issue Summary from the May 1995 IAC Meeting
Meeting Date: May 4, 1995	REO Contact: Gary S. Sims
Topic: FACA
Objective: Review FACA exemption language in 1995 Unfunded Mandates Bill and agree on related follow-up actions.
Summary of Discussion/IAC Actions: The REO presented the results of a review of the applicable section of the bill (Section 204). There are a number of unresolved issues about the language and its potential affect on the operations of the committee; e.g., what is meant by: "meetings exclusively" between federal and other governments, or "elected officers ... or their designated employees ... with authority to act on their behalf." The current USDA position regarding the legislation was summarized as: 1) The Department, not individual committees, will determine which advisory committees will be terminated and "re-formed" under Section 204; and, 2) the Department does not intend to act until the GSA publishes the interim regulation. GSA expects to have interim regulations to be released in early to mid-May 1995.
IAC Agreements: The IAC will continue to operate as an advisory committee until additional guidance and/or Department direction is received.
RIEC Decisions: NA
Follow-up Actions (who/what/when): The REO staff should keep abreast of activities at Departmental and GSA levels. Interim guidelines, when released, should be reviewed to see if they lead to a different assessment than presented to the committee.

Issue Summary from the May 1995 IAC Meeting
Meeting Date: May 4, 1995	REO Contact: Dan McKenzie
Topic: Research and Monitoring Committee (RMC) as a subcommittee.
Objective: Discuss and approve the RMC subcommittee charter. Finalize formation of the subcommittee.

Summary of Discussion/IAC Actions: The RMC presented the subcommittee charter and a communication strategy to facilitate participation by subcommittee members at reduced time/funding costs. The RMC also noted that no nominations from IAC members for new membership to the subcommittee have been received. It was pointed out that such nominations may be received at any time. IAC members stated that although the content of the subcommittee charter was acceptable, the format was difficult to read and understand. The IAC requested that the charter be re-written in a format similar to the IRICC charter. Some IAC members requested that the RMC review the possibility of moving meetings around the region in order to make them more accessible to a wider group of people and thereby enhance participation opportunities.

IAC Agreements: The IAC approved the charter of the RMC subcommittee.

RIEC Decisions: NA

Follow-up Actions (who/what/when): The RMC will re-write the subcommittee charter in a format similar to that of the IRICC. The RMC will explore opportunities to hold meetings in different geographic locations in order to enhance participation opportunities.

 

CHARTER

Group Name: Research and Monitoring Subcommittee

Date: May 5, 1995

Purpose: The Research and Monitoring Committee (RMC) is established as a subcommittee of the IAC to facilitate implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP) in three major areas: scientific oversight, monitoring, and research. In each of these areas, the RMC provides advice and guidance in the development of plans and guidelines to coordinate interagency planning, research and monitoring activities for NFP implementation. The RMC will report to the IAC through the Regional Ecosystem Office (REO) and will provide recommendations and reports on relevant scientific issues. Scope: The RMC works to develop strong scientific relationships among the participating agencies, Indian Tribes, management groups, and public and private organizations. These efforts focus on coordination, communication, information sharing, and planning to insure that the best available scientific information is developed and applied in ecosystem management. In addition, RMC develops guidelines for scientific oversight to achieve credible science of the highest quality in NFP implementation. Scientific oversight includes periodic review of the monitoring and research activities that support the NFP, as well as interpretation and recommendations for changes to the standards and guidelines. The RMC orchestrates the development of an interagency monitoring network plan to provide monitoring data that can be compared and interpreted across numerous agencies and on relevant temporal and spatial scales. This includes identification of information needs, monitoring designs and protocols, and guidelines for implementation at several spatial scales and project objectives. The RMC adopts a leadership role in working with the numerous groups developing monitoring activities as part of specific Plan implementation components; e.g., Watershed Analysis (WACT), Adaptive Management Areas (AMA), Late-Successional Reserves (LSR), Survey and Manage (S&M). The RMC coordinates the implementation of monitoring activities and aids in translating priority needs into action and budget plans. The RMC will periodically review and update this plan and evaluate progress toward meeting high priority monitoring needs. The RMC seeks to involve a wide spectrum of scientists and managers in the conduct and review of the monitoring activities. The RMC helps coordinate and facilitate priority research for the NFP through development of an interagency research plan. Annually, the RMC will review and update this plan, identify significant findings, and assess priority research needs. In addition, the RMC will help to translate this information into action and budget plans. The RMC will also work to coordinate the research activities conducted in the AMA's. Significant research results and their implications for management actions, and standards and guidelines will be highlighted. The annual assessment will also present an evaluation of the implementation of the research plan and progress towards acquisition of priority scientific information. Membership: Currently the RMC has representatives from the following participating agencies: EPA, BIA, FS, NMFS, NPS, NRCS, BLM, FWS, USGS, and NBS. These members will continue and be joined by representatives from the additional IAC organizations. Representatives are expected to contribute to the success of the RMC and to provide the necessary coordination and communication with their organization. The RMC is supported by three full-time staff on assignment from FS, NBS, and EPA research organizations, in coordination with the Regional Ecosystem Office (REO). These staff will provide support for scientific oversight, monitoring, and research, and are designated as the Research and Monitoring Group (RMG). Meeting Schedule: RMC meetings are open and encourage broad participation. Meetings are held twice monthly; while attendance is encouraged, participation via conference call will be provided whenever feasible. Pre-meeting materials and agendas will be distributed prior to meetings. Meeting notes will be distributed following the meetings. Electronic communication will be used to the maximum extent feasible to facilitate committee operations and information sharing. Leadership: The committee will be chaired by the RMG staff assigned to Scientific Oversight. The Chair will be expected to serve as coordinator and facilitator in support of RMC objectives as determined by the IAC. Project Teams: The RMC will create working groups on an as needed basis. Ongoing groups will address monitoring and research issues and planning. Funding: Participating organizations are responsible for covering costs associated with subcommittee activities.

Issue Summary from the May 1995 IAC Meeting
Meeting Date: May 4, 1995	REO Contact: Tim Quinn
Topic: Interoganizational Resource Information Coordinating Council (IRICC) Charter
Objective: Discuss and approve the IRICC subcommittee charter. Finalize formation of the subcommittee.
Summary of Discussion/IAC Actions: The IRICC presented a summary of its charter. Ensuing discussion and questions included: 1. IRICC's efforts to include representatives from California. 2. IRICC's scope beyond federal lands. 3. Potential overlap between IRICC and Research and Monitoring Committee. 4. Clarification of specific provisions within the charter.
IAC Agreements: The IAC approved the IRICC charter with modifications to clearly state that the geographic scope includes Washington, Oregon, and northern California; and, to change references from "Treaty Rights" to "Federally Reserved Rights."
RIEC Decisions: N/A
Follow-up Actions (who/what/when): Tim Quinn will contact Mark Stanley of the State of California Resources Agency concerning coordination of fire information systems with IRICC. IRICC and the Research and Monitoring Committee were asked to ensure that they have at least one member in common to coordinate and avoid duplication. Tim Quinn will contact the county and tribal representatives to obtain their nominations for the IRICC subcommittee.

Issue Summary from the May 1995 IAC Meeting
Meeting Date: May 4, 1995	REO Contact: Chris Hamilton
Topic: Activity Information Sharing (Management Information Sharing)
Objective: Review and provide direction concerning format and possible content items of a proposed management information system.
Summary of Discussion/IAC Actions: The REO suggested the following activities which agencies may consider sharing information: Timber Sales Restoration Projects FERC License Renewals Future ESA Listings Section 7 Consultation Section 303d Impaired Waterbodies Watershed Analysis LSR Assessments Adaptive Management Area Plans During the presentation, IAC members identified the following additional items of interest: Status of the Proposed 4(d) Rule Location and Status of HCPs Conservation Agreements Consultation Timeline Annual Accomplishments and Budget Report It was noted that a consistent set of watershed boundaries is needed to make the information easily used and understood. Private lands must be included in watershed delineation and coverage should be rangewide.
IAC Agreements: The IAC supported the concept of an Activity Information Sharing system as presented, but made it clear that it is to be developed by using existing data. The first two priorities of the REO GIS staff are Survey and Manage and Watershed Delineations. The Activity Information Sharing is third priority. RIEC Decisions: NA
Follow-up Actions (who/what/when): The REO GIS staff will collect the above information and distribute "paper copies" to all IAC members. The REO GIS staff will initiate a pilot test to attempt to spatially tie together: timber sales, watershed analyses, Jobs-in-the-Woods projects, impaired waterbodies, and fish stocks being considered for ESA listing. The REO GIS staff will work with the IRICC to collect and distribute the information listed; agencies will refer resources to Chris Hamilton to collect the information. A progress report will be presented at the July IAC meeting.

 

July 6, 1995
IAC In Seattle, Washington

Watershed Analysis Guide --Brief the IAC on the final Guide, including the disposition of issues identified during the June IAC meeting.

Ecosystem Restoration/Jobs-in-the-Woods --Seek resolution of any outstanding issues.

Information Management --Presentation on a consistent set of watershed boundaries.

• Activity Information Sharing --Update
• Survey and Manage --Update

August 3, 1995
IAC In Portland, Oregon

Research and Monitoring Committee --Status briefing on research and monitoring surveys and the Effectiveness Monitoring Plan.

Information Management --Present integrated resource information system between REO, BLM, and FS (at a minimum).

Role of Government-to-Government Consultation --Present an analysis of ways to enhance government-to-government consultation and communication between federal, tribal, state, and local governments on issues related to the implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan.

• Provincial Presentation --Invite the chair from a provincial committee to make a presentation concerning local issues and activities.

Available at the Registration Desk
1. May 1995 Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda and Prework Package dated April 27, 1995.
2. Ecosystem Restoration/Jobs-in-the-Woods Background Paper dated May 3, 1995.
3. Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale: The Revised Federal Guide for Watershed Analysis dated March 24, 1995.
4. Federal Register Notice dated February 17, 1995, containing the Proposed 4(d) Rule.
5. Record of Decision dated April 1994.
6. Consolidated Budget dated May 2, 1995.
7. March 28-29, 1995, IAC Meeting Notes dated April 5, 1995.
8. RIEC list dated April 13, 1995.
9. IAC list dated April 29, 1995.
10. Criteria to Exempt Specific Silvicultural Activities in LSRs and MLSAs from REO Review dated April 20, 1995.
11. GIS plots/maps.
12. REO Organization Chart.
13. Acronym List and Acronym Definition List.
14. Management Information System dated April 14, 1995.
15. Review of Revised Draft Interagency Implementation Monitoring Plan dated April 24, 1995.
16. Watershed Restoration Strategy dated May 3, 1995, from Mike Spear to Gary Morishima.
17. Recission Language dated May 4, 1995.
18. Charter for IAC Policy & REO Staff Group on Watershed Analysis generated May 4, 1995.
19. Registration sign-in sheets for Public and Intergovernmental attendees.
20. Draft revised Watershed Analysis Guide.
21. REO Log of Comments received on the draft revised Guide.
22. Summary of Comments received on the draft revised Guide.
23. Summary of Issues received on the draft revised Guide.
24. IAC Agreement Needed Today on WACT recommendations.
25. Timeline for revision of Ecosystem Analysis Guide
26. Watershed Analysis Direction to WACT memo dated January 31, 1995.

Presentations using overheads:
27. Committee review of comments on the draft revised Watershed Analysis Guide.
28. Ecosystem Restoration/Jobs-in-the-Woods.
29. Approve RMC Charter as a Subcommittee.
30. Approve IRICC Charter as a Subcommittee.
31. Proposed Management Information System.

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting May 4, 1995 Attendance List
Name	Title	Agency

IAC Members and Alternates:

Bell, Amy	Deputy Super. for Community	Washington Depart. of Natural Resources
Blomstrom, Greg	Forest Planner	CA Indian Forest & Fire Mgmt Council
Collopy, Mike	Director, Coop. Reasearch & Tech.	National Biological Service
Eggers, Ron	Assistant Area Director Branch	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Frankel, Anita	Director, Forest and Salmon	Environmental Protection Agency
Gorton, Terry	Asst. Sec, Forest. & Rural Econ.	Office of the Governor, State of California
Graham, Bob	State Conservationist	Natural Resources Conservation Service
Jope, Kathy	Chief, Research & Resources	National Park Service
Knowles, Don (DFO)	Executive Director	Regional Ecosystem Office
Lackey, Robert	Deputy Dirctor	Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Lowe, John	Regional Forester	Forest Service, R-6
McVay, Rocky	County Commissioner	Curry County, State of Oregon
Moon, Mel	Commissioner	NW Indian Fisheries Commission
Morishima, Gary	Technical Advisor	Intertribal Timber Council
Nichols, Bob	Senior Executive Policy	Office of the Governor, State of Washington
Philpot, Charles	Station Director	Forest Service, PNW
Spear, Michael	Regional Director	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Sullivan, Francie	Shasta County Supervisor,	Shasta County, State of California
Tuchmann, Tom (ex	Director	Office of Forestry & Economic Development
Wolden, Harvey	County Commissioner	Skagit County, State of Washington
Wyland, Jacquelene	Chief, Envir & Tech Sve Div	National Marine Fisheries Service
Zielinski, Elaine	State Director	Bureau of Land Management, OR/WA

Regional Ecosystem Office:

Fritzler, Carol Lee	Administrative Officer	Forest Service
Hamilton, Chris	GIS	Bureau of Land Management
Kucera, Linda	Facilitator	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Loop, Curt	Representative	Corps of Engineers
McKenzie, Dan	Research & Monitoring Leader	Environmental Protection Agency
Pietrzak, Debbie	Representative	Bureau of Land Management
Powers, Dave	Representative	Environmental Protection Agency
Quinn, Tim	GIA Administrator	Bureau of Land Management
Romancier, Bob	Research & Monitoring	Forest Service, PNW
Siegel, Greg	GIS	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Sims, Gary	Representative	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Sisto, Tony	Representative	National Park Service
Tehan, Mike	Representative	National Marine Fisheries Service
Watson, Jay	Representive	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Wilson, Karen	GIS	Forest Service
Ystad, Laurie	Secretary	Forest Service

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting May 4, 1995 Attendance List
Name	Title	Agency

Other Intergovernmental Agencies:

Belisbe, Harold	Forest Plan Coordinator	Bureau of Land Management
Bradley, Bill	Forestry Chief	Bureau of Land Management
Caraher, Dave	Riparian Manager, Coordinator	Forest Service, R-6
Clauson, Steve	R-5 Representative	Forest Service, R-5
Cleland, Bruce	Watershed Team	Environmental Protection Agency
Connaughton, Kent	Assitant Director, Economic Dev.	Office of Forestry & Economic Development
Connelly, Margaret	Resource Info. Resources	Forest Service, R-6
Crete, Ron		U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Dippon, Dwane	GIS Specialist	Bureau of Land Management
Freedman, Lisa	Assistant Director Natural	Office of Forestry & Economic Development
Hall, Jean	Director, State & Private Forestry	Forest Service, R-5
Hollowed, John	Director, Habitat Services	NW Indian Fisheries Commission
Howell, Dave	District Manager	Bureau of Land Management, CA
Jackson, Gerry	Deputy Assistant Regional Director	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Johnson, Richard	Deputy, State Director, Resources	Bureau of Land Management, CA
Lawrence, Mark	Associate District Manager	Bureau of Land Management
Lohman, Cheryl	Native American Coordinator	Corps of Engineers
Magee, Jerry	Watershed Team Member	Bureau of Land Management
Mason, Jerry	Public Involvement Coordinator	Forest Service, R-6
Mattson, Phil	Environmental Coordinator	Forest Service, R-6
McDonald, Dennis	Forestry Coordinator	NW Indian Fisheries Commission
McMinds, Guy	Executive Office Advisor	Quinault Indian Nation
Ogden, Cay	Watershed Team Member	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Ray, Bill		Klamath Tribes
Shaffer, Anne	Policy Analyst	Quileute Tribe
Somers, Dave	Watershed Team	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Sprague, Lynn	Regional Forester	Forest Service, R-5
Tugel, Arlene	Assistant State Conservationist	Natural Resources Conservaiton Service
Young, Tim	Geographer	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Public:

Keeton, Bill		Wilderness Society
Meslow, Charles	Field Representative	Wildlife Management Institute