Regional Ecosystem Office

333 SW 1st
P.O. Box 3623
Portland, Oregon 97208-3623
Phone: (503) 326-6265 FAX: (503) 326-6282

Memorandum

Date: August 9, 1995

To: Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Members (See distribution list)

From: Donald R. Knowles, Executive Director

Subject: August 1995 Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting Notes

Enclosed are the notes from the August 1995 Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC) meeting, including:

Executive Summary
An issue summary for Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale: The Federal Guide for Watershed Analysis (Revised August 1995)
List of Potential Agenda Topics for the September 28 Meeting
Possible Agenda Items for the November Meeting
List of Meeting Handouts
List of Meeting Attendees

Our next IAC meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 28, in Redding, California, with an IAC field trip planned for the afternoon of Wednesday, September 27. An additional field trip is being planned for Friday, September 29, primarily for REO staff. IAC members would be welcome on either field trip. Logistical information will be sent to you as soon as the details are worked out. If you have any questions or suggestions, please contact Gary S. Sims (503-326-6274), Linda Kucera (503-326-6283) or your agency representative.

Enclosure

cc:
REO
OFED

460/ly

Date: August 9, 1995
Subject: August IAC Meeting Notes

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Distribution List

California
Francie Sullivan, Shasta County Supervisor
Terry Gorton, Assistant Secretary, Forestry and Rural Economic Dev., California Resource Agency

Oregon
Rocky McVay, Curry County Commissioner
Paula Burgess, Assistant to the Governor for Natural Resources, Office of the Governor

Washington
Harvey Wolden, Skagit County Commissioner
Amy F. Bell, Deputy Supervisor for Community Relations, WA Dept. of Natural Resources
Bob Nichols, Senior Executive Policy Assistant, Governor's Office (Alternate)

Tribes
Greg Blomstrom, Planning Forester, CA Indian Forest & Fire Management Council
Mel Moon, Commissioner, NW Indian Fisheries Commission
Jim Anderson, Executive Director, NW Indian Fisheries Commission (Alternate)
Gary Morishima, Technical Advisor, Intertribal Timber Council
Guy McMinds, Executive Office Advisor, Quinault Indian Nation (Alternate)

Federal Agencies
Michael Collopy, Director, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, National Biological Service
Dennis Fenn, Western Regional Director, National Biological Service
Anita Frankel, Director, Forest and Salmon Group, Environmental Protection Agency
Eugene Andreuccetti, Regional Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Bob Graham, State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (Alternate)
John Lowe, Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service, R-6
G. Lynn Sprague, Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service, R-5 (Alternate)
Thomas Murphy, Director, Environmental Research Laboratory, Environmental Protection Agency
Charles Philpot, Station Director, Forest Service, PNW
Stan Speaks, Area Director, Portland Area Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Ron Eggers, Assistant Area Director, Portland Area Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Alternate)
Ron Jaeger, Area Director, Sacramento Area Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Michael Spear, Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
William Stelle, Jr., Regional Director, National Marine Fisheries Service
Hilda Diaz-Soltero, Southwest Regional Director, National Marine Fisheries Service (Alternate)
Jacqueline Wyland, Division Chief, Environ. & Tech. Services, National Marine Fisheries Service (Alternate)
Elizabeth Gaar, Senior Policy Coordinator, National Marine Fisheries Service (Alternate)
Tom Tuchmann, Director, Office of Forestry and Economic Development (Ex Officio)
William Walters, Deputy Field Director, National Park Service
Elaine Zielinski, State Director, Bureau of Land Management, OR/WA
Ed Hastey, State Director, Bureau of Land Management, CA (Alternate)
Dave Howell, District Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Ukiah, CA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTERGOVERNMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING

August 3, 1995

Opening Comments by Committee Chair - John Lowe

Welcome all members and the public to the August meeting.
July minutes were certified as correct by the Chair.
Today's meeting will focus on final closure on Section I and reaching agreement on the objectives and the next steps in the development of Section II of the Federal Guide to Watershed Analysis.

Watershed Analysis: Final Closure on Section I - John Lowe

Recommendation by the IAC and agreement of the RIEC to issue Section I of the Guide with the following adjustments:

Add the word "not" to pages 3, 19, and 25 to reflect the agreement reached at the July 19 and August 3 IAC policy group meetings. The document now reads: "The rationale for determining that a core question is not applicable will be documented."
Add a paragraph in the Guide under the section titled "Relationship to Other Laws, Regulations, Processes, and Lands" to acknowledge federal trust responsibilities to Indian tribes. The recommended paragraph will be added under the sub-heading: "Federal Trust Responsibilities to Indian Tribes."
The REO agreed to review suggested editorial changes submitted by IAC members before issuing the Guide; e.g., add references to Section 4 and 10 of the ESA in appropriate places, strengthen or add additional references to fire, and include an appropriate reference to Section II in the transmittal letter.
The transmittal letter for distribution of Section I of the Guide will indicate that Section II of the Guide will be developed as a "toolbox" for users of Section I, and that production and distribution will begin in the near future.

Watershed Analysis: Agreement and Next Steps for Section II - Ranotta McNair

General agreement on purpose: Section II will serve as a technical supplement or "tool box" for Section I. As new or revised watershed "analysis methods, techniques, and analytical approaches" become available, the RIEC Chair will issue them through separate transmittal letters.

General agreement on goals of Section II: meet Northwest Forest Plan (NFP) goals, ensure scientific credibility, provide "methods and techniques," and provide for cooperation and coordination with other watershed analysis processes.

Additional Direction and Agreements:

The REO was asked to assess existing Section II "methods and techniques" to determine: a) the potential utility of each "method and technique" to be used in conjunction with the Guide while developing responses to the core topics and questions; b) the current condition, and degree of readiness, for release and use; and c) the amount of consensus about the contents of each "method and technique." Additionally, the REO was asked to identify format needs, timelines, and resources necessary for revision of "methods and techniques" for possible presentation at the September IAC meeting.
The REO will propose a set of sideboards for each "method and technique":
1. Consistent format and constraints.
2. Consistent basic data (varying degrees of consistency may be appropriate or needed).
3. Data provides basis for later decisions.
4. Integration and/or synthesis of tools where appropriate to complement each other.
Existing "methods and techniques" will be reviewed to determine which will be reformatted and revised to reflect changes, core topics, and agreements reached in Section I of the Guide. The REO will propose a set of "methods and techniques" to be released as soon as they are ready. This group will consist of those that are final and in a polished form, offer the most utility, and have the least amount of controversy.
Before release of the revised "methods and techniques" or beginning development of new ones, a status report conference call will be held with IAC members.
At the September IAC meeting, the REO will present progress to date and review proposals for moving forward on Section II.
The "methods and techniques" in Section II are dynamic and will change over time. As individual "methods and techniques" are developed/revised, the RIEC Chair will issue them separately or as a set of "methods and techniques."

Public Comment - Emphasis on Section II

No one requested time on the agenda to address the committee.

Habitat Conservation Planning within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl - Curt Smitch, Assistant Regional Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

The FWS is encouraging State and private timberland owners to develop Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) for their lands under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act.
An HCP accompanies an application for an incidental take permit.
Nationally there are 759 Endangered Species, 202 Threatened Species, and 4,097 Candidate Species.
There are several tools for achieving conservation objectives for Threatened and Endangered Species - recovery plans, HCPs, 4(d) rules, section 7 consultations, and others.
HCPs are a means for nonfederal projects that impact listed species to proceed.
HCPs contain an analysis of project impacts to species considered and alternatives to the proposed action, actions to minimize impacts, and assurances of adequate implementation.
By using HCPs, applicants continue activities, avoid litigation, minimize consultation, and provide certainty to their activities.
By using HCPs, the FWS contributes to recovery of species, encourages cooperative planning, and builds consensus.
In the range of the Northern Spotted Owl, three HCPs have been completed covering approximately 640,000 acres. An additional 20 HCPs are underway in Washington, Oregon, and California.

Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee - James Golden, Deputy Forest Supervisor, Deschutes National Forest, Chair of the Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) and the Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC)

The Deschutes PAC meets quarterly in a 2-day format: field trips on the first day to review projects, needs, and activities; and on the second day is formal meeting sessions.
The committee members have identified principle issues and concerns: sustainability, forest health, water quality, quality recreation, and relationships (federal/non-federal landowners and users).
Guidelines for selecting watershed restoration projects include:
Visibility, so the public can see and understand restoration activities.
Present the greatest return for the effort.
Promote partnerships and cost-share opportunities.
Restore anadromous fish runs.
The Deschutes PIEC has prepared a program of work for the coming year (for the PAC):
Provide advice on a range of issues, and fulfill Resource Advisory Councils (RAC) responsibilities regarding grazing issues.
Give input on the Eastside project (Walla Walla).
Support, critique, and review watershed restoration projects.
Identify barriers, counter-productive regulations, and "ways to improve doing business."
Identify ways to improve participation of the public in the management of federal lands.
Comment on planning efforts such as Wild & Scenic Rivers, watershed analysis, urban interface issues, and LSR assessments.
The focus of the PAC will remain on policy, not individual projects.
Needs from the IAC include:
Keeping informed on what the IAC is doing and the results of IAC meetings.
Using the IAC as a forum for elevating issues that need resolution at a higher level.

Proposed Coho Salmon Listing - Garth Griffin, National Marine Fisheries Service

Proposal: On July 19 the NMFS proposed listing three evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) of coho salmon on the Pacific coast as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The proposed listing will include Central California Coast, Southern Oregon/Northern California Coasts, and the Oregon Coast (all native coho salmon stocks from south of the Columbia River to northern Monterey Bay California). Two additional ESUs (Lower Columbia River/Southwestern Washington Coast and Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia) were given candidate status, which requires NMFS to reevaluate their status in 1 year.

The Salmon Conservation Strategy: NMFS intends to move rapidly during the next year to develop an organized federal, state, tribal, and local salmon conservation strategy that builds on

efforts underway throughout the three states. The key elements of the salmon conservation strategy consist of the following:

The Northwest Forest Plan
Local Watershed Protection and Restoration Efforts
Harvest Management (Fisheries)
Existing State Programs
For the Sake of Salmon

Next Steps: NMFS will hold public hearings in Washington, Oregon, and California. The public comment period on the proposed listings ends October 23, and the final determination for listing is to be completed by July 1996.

Salvage Update - John Lowe, Elaine Zielinski, and Tom Tuchmann

Public Law 104-19 includes nationwide provisions for timber salvage, and language regarding green tree sales, including the disposition of Section 318 sales. At this time, the salvage provisions are less controversial than the ones concerning Section 318 sales in the area of the NFP. The Section 318 language is being reviewed at the Washington level to clarify: the definition of marbled murrelet nesting, whether particular substitute volume must be identified within 45 days, and whether the language is specific to Section 318 sales or whether it applies to sales within the geographic area of Section 318. Depending on the final interpretation, implementation of the Section 318 sale provisions may be more or less challenging, with varying implications for the NFP.

HOT TOPICS

Revised Proposal to Designate Critical Habitat for the Marbled Murrelet - Curt Smitch

Critical habitat designation does not impose any restrictions on non-federal lands unless there are federal funds, permits, or activities involved.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposes to designate approximately 4.4 million acres of land, 69% of which (approximately 3 million acres) is located on federal lands within the NFP. At the present time, there is a prohibition on new designation of critical habitat. This could mean that the proposal will not be put into final form; i.e., the FWS may not complete the designation of critical habitat.

Marbled Murrelet Recovery Plan - Curt Smitch

The NFP has served as the backbone for developing a recovery strategy for the murrelet.
The Washington, Oregon, and California populations are apparently declining at a rate of 4% to 7% per year based upon computerized projections.
The recovery plan describes a process for delisting of the species.
As a result of harvest of older forests, marbled murrelets no longer occur throughout their former range. They are found in six geographic zones generally associated with large tracts of older forests close to the coast.

Forest Health - Anita Frankel, Director, Forest and Salmon Group, Environmental Protection Agency

An interagency meeting will be held in Washington, D.C., next week concerning forest health.

Eastside Project - John Lowe

Legislation in the House proposed eliminating funding for the project. The Senate version retains a reduced amount of funding, and directs the project to be completed using a Record of Decision for each forest and district, instead of one general Record of Decision for the whole project.
Primary issues involve ecosystem management on private lands.
The Senate language proposes to have the draft completed by November and the final to be completed four months later.
John expressed his view that the involvement of the affected counties made the difference between the House and Senate versions of the language, and also expressed his thanks for the counties support.

Issue Summary from the August IAC Meeting
Meeting Date: August 3, 1995	REO Contact: Ranotta McNair
Topic: Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale: The Federal Guide for Watershed Analysis (Revised August 1995) (Guide)
Objective: 1. Section I of the Guide: Summarize results of the July 19 and August 3 policy meetings. Finalize agreement on Section I of the Guide. Agree on production and distribution schedules. *2. Section II of the Guide:* Agree on the purpose and objectives of Section II of the Guide (analysis methods, techniques, and analytical approaches). Agree on an approach and provide clear direction to the REO for moving forward. Summary of Discussion/IAC Actions: *1. Section I of the Guide:* The IAC agreed to adopt the recommendations from the July 19 policy group meeting and August 3 breakfast meeting (reflected in "RIEC Decisions" section). IAC concurred that the rewrite of Section I resolved issues previously raised by IAC members. The IAC agreed to the distribution of Section I of the Guide. 2. Section II of the Guide: General Agreement of Purpose: Section II will serve as a technical supplement or "tool box" for Section I. The REO will draft wording for Section I of the Guide and a letter of transmittal to describe the linkages between Sections I & II. As new or revised watershed "technical tools" or "methods and techniques" become available, the RIEC Chair will issue them through separate transmittal letters. The IAC suggested the following Goals and Objectives for Section II: Goals: Meet NFP goals. Ensure scientific credibility. Provide methods and techniques. Provide for cooperation and coordination with other watershed analysis processes. Key Objectives: The federal process must maintain flexibility to ensure that state, tribal, county, and local watershed processes can be incorporated locally. Section II of the Guide is a technical supplement or "tool box" for watershed analysis.
IAC Agreements: Section I of the Guide: Agreed to finalizing and issuing Section I of the Guide. Section II of the Guide: Agreed to having a Section II, a technical supplement or "tool box," linked to Section I of the Guide. The IAC asked that the REO take the lead role and assess workloads, identify priorities, timelines, and resources needed to revise Section II of the Guide. The RIEC Chair will transmit Section II of the Guide under separate cover(s). Section II agreements (modified alternative four): The REO was asked to assess Section II, draft analysis "methods and techniques" to determine potential utility, degree of readiness, and consensus about use with the Guide in response to the developed core topics and questions, and identify format needs, timelines, and resources necessary for revision of "methods and techniques." At the September IAC meeting, the REO may present and discuss possible approaches for moving forward with Section II. The methods and techniques in Section II are dynamic and will change overtime. As individual "methods and techniques" are developed/revised, the RIEC Chair will issue them separately or as a set of analysis techniques. "Methods and techniques" will be reformatted and revised to reflect changes, core topics, and agreements reached in Section I of the Guide. Sideboards for revision of Section II of the Guide "methods and techniques": Consistent format and constraints. Consistent basic data (varying degrees of consistency may be appropriate or needed). Data provides basis for later decisions. Integration and/or synthesis of tools where appropriate to complement each other.
RIEC Decisions: Agreement to issue Section I of the Guide with the following adjustments: Add the word "not" to pages 3, 19, and 25 to reflect the agreement reached at the July 19 and August 3 IAC policy group meetings. The document now reads: "The rationale for determining that a core question is not applicable will be documented." Add a paragraph in the Guide under the section titled "Relationship to Other Laws, Regulations, Processes, and Lands" to acknowledge federal trust responsibilities to Indian tribes. The recommended paragraph will be added under the subheading: "Federal Trust Responsibilities to Indian Tribes." The transmittal letter for distribution of Section I of the Guide will link it to Section II, which will be identified as being developed for release beginning in the near future. The REO agreed to review suggested editorial changes submitted by IAC member's before issuing the Guide; e.g., Section 4 and 10 of the ESA, strengthen references to fire, and Section II references. Appropriate changes will be incorporated.
Follow-up Actions (who/what/when): The REO was asked to assess existing Section II, draft "methods and techniques" to determine: a) potential utility with the Guide in response to the developed core topics and questions; b) current condition, and degree of readiness, for release and use; and c) the amount of consensus about the contents of each package. Additionally, the REO was asked to identify format needs, timelines, and resources necessary for revision of "methods and techniques" at the September IAC meeting. REO was asked to provide sideboards for revision of Section II of the Guide "methods and techniques": Consistent format and constraints. Consistent basic data (varying degrees of consistency may be appropriate or needed). Data provides basis for later decisions. Integration and/or synthesis of tools where appropriate to complement each other. "Methods and techniques" will be reformatted and revised to reflect changes, core topics, and agreements reached in Section I of the Guide. The REO will propose a set of tools to be released as soon as they are ready. This group will consist of those that are final and in a polished form, offer the most utility, and have the least amount of controversy. Before release of the revised "methods and techniques" or beginning development of new ones, a status report conference call will be held with IAC members. At the September IAC meeting the REO may present progress todate and review proposals for moving forward on Section II. The "methods and techniques" in Section II are dynamic and will change over time. As individual "methods and techniques" are developed/revised, the RIEC Chair will issue them separately or as a set of "methods and techniques."

Potential Agenda Topics for the
September 28, 1995 IAC Meeting
Redding, California
9:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.

TIME	DURATION	POTENTIAL AGENDA TOPICS	PRESENTER
9:00		Welcome, certify the August meeting notes, and review the September meeting objectives and agenda	John Lowe & Linda Kucera
		Research & Monitoring Committee Implementation Monitoring Plan Effectiveness Monitoring Plan	Dan McKenzie
		Salvage Issues	John Lowe and RIEC
		Break
		IRICC Vegetation Strike Team Policy Issues Associated with Options Agreement and Marching Orders - Next Steps	Tim Quinn Miles Hemstrom Chris Cadwell
		Lunch
		Provincial Advisory Committee Presentation	TBA
		OFED Report Update	Tom Tuchmann
		Watershed Analysis Guide Section II Update	Mike Tehan
		Break
		Budget Potential Budget Impacts on the NFP Propose REO FY96 Budget - Dispose in November	John Lowe Elaine Zielinski Don Knowles
		Possible Agenda Items for the November Meeting	John Lowe & Elaine Zielinski
		Hot Topics	All
		Public Comment	Linda Kucera
		Closing Comments	John Lowe
4:30		Adjourn	John Lowe

Possible Status Reports for September 28, 1995

Federal Timber Sale Program Update.
PIEC/PAC - Communication links and opportunities to raise problems for IAC resolution.
Salmon.
4(d) Rule.

Preliminary Agenda Topics for November 2, 1995

Change of chair from John Lowe to Elaine Zielinski--Opening remarks by Elaine. (To be held in Sacramento, California, details forthcoming.)
Sharing of Key Interests--Redistribute the list of interests captured during the March IAC meeting for a progress check and to assist us in setting fiscal year 1996 goals.
Role of Government-to-Government Consultation--Present an analysis of ways to enhance government-to-government consultation and communication between federal, state, tribal, and local governments on issues related to the implementation of the NFP.
REO Budget for FY '96--Closure.

August IAC Handouts:

Status Reports:
Effectiveness Monitoring Plan
Western WA Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee
IRICC Framework Data - California Update

Other Handouts:
Organizational Chart- NW Forest Plan
IAC Identification List
RIEC Identification List
REO Telephone Directory
Acronym List and Acronym Definition
July IAC Notes
August IAC Agenda & Prework
PIEC Presentation Information
Record of Decision (ROD)
Correspondence Log with Current Correspondence Sent - Available for requests
Interagency Vegetation Information Report of the Vegetation Strike Team (June 1, 1995)
Effectiveness Monitoring Plan Report (July 21, 1995)
Draft Recovery Plan Marbled Murrelet Report , U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (July 1995)
Federal Register, Proposed Threatened Status for Three Contiguous ESUs of Coho Salmon
Coho Salmon Briefing Package (July 19, 1995)
Sheet and Rill Erosion (Preliminary Evaluation)
Issues Related to Section I & Section II Proposal for the WA Guide memo (August 2, 1995)
Rescission Bill Proposal
FWS Info Re: draft recovery plan and critical habitat marbled murrelet
3rd Quarter Report on Adaptive Management Areas
Summary addressing Salvage Timber Sales (July 27, 1995)
Results from the July 19 WA Policy Meeting memo (July 10 and July 21, 1995)

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting
August 3, 1995 Attendance List

Name Title Agency

IAC Members and Alternates:

Blomstrom, Greg Forest Planner CA Indian Forest & Fire Mgmt Council

Brown, Jim State Forester Office of Governor, State of Oregon

Collopy, Mike Director, Coop. Reasearch & Tech. National Biological Service

Frankel, Anita Director, Forest and Salmon Group Environmental Protection Agency

Gorton, Terry Asst. Sec, Forest. & Rural Econ. Dev. Office of the Governor, State of California

Graham, Bob State Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service

Knowles, Don (DFO) Executive Director Regional Ecosytem Office

Lowe, John Regional Forester Forest Service, R-6

McVay, Rocky County Commissioner Curry County, State of Oregon

Moeller, George Deputy Station Director Forest Service, PNW

Moon, Mel Commissioner NW Indian Fisheries Commission

Morishima, Gary Technical Advisor Intertribal Timber Council

Nichols, Bob Senior Executive Policy Assistant Washington Dept. of Natural Resources

Speaks, Stan Area Director Bureau of Indian Affairs

Spear, Mike Regional Director U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Stelle, William Jr. Regional Director National Marine Fisheries Service

Sullivan, Francie Shasta County Supervisor, District 3 Shasta County, State of California

Tuchmann, Tom Director Office of Economic & Forestry Development

Walters, Bill Deputy Regional Director National Park Service

Wolden, Harvey County Commissioner Skagit County, State of Washington

Zielinski, Elaine State Director Bureau of Land Management, OR/WA

Regional Ecosystem Office:

Fritzler, Carol Lee Administrative Officer Forest Service

Kucera, Linda Facilitator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

McNair, Ranotta Representative Forest Service

Pietrzak, Debbie Representative Bureau of Land Management

Powers, Dave Representative Environmental Protection Agency

Quinn, Tim GIA Administrator Bureau of Land Management

Romancier, Bob Research & Monitoring Forest Service, PNW

Sims, Gary Representative Bureau of Indian Affairs

Sisto, Tony Representative National Park Service

Watson, Jay Representive U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Ystad, Laurie Secretary Forest Service

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting
August 3, 1995 Attendance List

Name Title Agency

Other Intergovernmental Agencies:

Bradley, Bill Forestry Chief Bureau of Land Management

Caraher, Dave Riparian Manager, Coordinator Forest Service, R-6

Clauson, Steve R-5 Representative Forest Service, R-5

Clune, Tom Policy Analyst Bonneville Power Administration

Gaar, Elizabeth Senior Policy Coordinator, NW Region Natural Marine Fisheries Service

Golden, Jim DES PAC Speaker Forest Service, R-6, Deschutes NF

Grffin, Garth Protected Species Advisor National Marine Fisheries Service

Hall, Jean Director, State & Private Forestry Forest Service, R-5

Magee, Jerry Watershed Team Bureau of Land Management

Mason, Jerry Public Involvement Coordinator Forest Service, R-6

McDonald, Dennis Forestry Coordinator NW Indian Fisheries Commission

McMinds, Guys Executive Office Advisor Quinault Indian Nation

Nehlse, Willa Biologist Pacific Rivers Council

Ogden, Cay Watershed Team U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Shaffer, Anne Policy Analyst Quileute Tribe

Sherer, Steve Bonneville Power Administration

Smitch, Curt Assistant Regional Director U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Smith, Alexandra Group Vice President Bonneville Power Administration

Somers, Dave Watershed Team Bureau of Indian Affairs

Sprague, Lynn Regional Forester Forest Service, R-5

Tugel, Arlene Assistant State Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service

Warner, Bonita Cultural Leader Quileute Tribe

Public:

Suzomoto, Bruce Biologist Pacific Power Commission

Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Meeting August 3, 1995 Attendance List
Name	Title	Agency

Blomstrom, Greg	Forest Planner	CA Indian Forest & Fire Mgmt Council
Brown, Jim	State Forester	Office of Governor, State of Oregon
Collopy, Mike	Director, Coop. Reasearch & Tech.	National Biological Service
Frankel, Anita	Director, Forest and Salmon Group	Environmental Protection Agency
Gorton, Terry	Asst. Sec, Forest. & Rural Econ. Dev.	Office of the Governor, State of California
Graham, Bob	State Conservationist	Natural Resources Conservation Service
Knowles, Don (DFO)	Executive Director	Regional Ecosytem Office
Lowe, John	Regional Forester	Forest Service, R-6
McVay, Rocky	County Commissioner	Curry County, State of Oregon
Moeller, George	Deputy Station Director	Forest Service, PNW
Moon, Mel	Commissioner	NW Indian Fisheries Commission
Morishima, Gary	Technical Advisor	Intertribal Timber Council
Nichols, Bob	Senior Executive Policy Assistant	Washington Dept. of Natural Resources
Speaks, Stan	Area Director	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Spear, Mike	Regional Director	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Stelle, William Jr.	Regional Director	National Marine Fisheries Service
Sullivan, Francie	Shasta County Supervisor, District 3	Shasta County, State of California
Tuchmann, Tom	Director	Office of Economic & Forestry Development
Walters, Bill	Deputy Regional Director	National Park Service
Wolden, Harvey	County Commissioner	Skagit County, State of Washington
Zielinski, Elaine	State Director	Bureau of Land Management, OR/WA

Fritzler, Carol Lee	Administrative Officer	Forest Service
Kucera, Linda	Facilitator	U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
McNair, Ranotta	Representative	Forest Service
Pietrzak, Debbie	Representative	Bureau of Land Management
Powers, Dave	Representative	Environmental Protection Agency
Quinn, Tim	GIA Administrator	Bureau of Land Management
Romancier, Bob	Research & Monitoring	Forest Service, PNW
Sims, Gary	Representative	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Sisto, Tony	Representative	National Park Service
Watson, Jay	Representive	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Ystad, Laurie	Secretary	Forest Service

Bradley, Bill	Forestry Chief	Bureau of Land Management
Caraher, Dave	Riparian Manager, Coordinator	Forest Service, R-6
Clauson, Steve	R-5 Representative	Forest Service, R-5
Clune, Tom	Policy Analyst	Bonneville Power Administration
Gaar, Elizabeth	Senior Policy Coordinator, NW Region	Natural Marine Fisheries Service
Golden, Jim	DES PAC Speaker	Forest Service, R-6, Deschutes NF
Grffin, Garth	Protected Species Advisor	National Marine Fisheries Service
Hall, Jean	Director, State & Private Forestry	Forest Service, R-5
Magee, Jerry	Watershed Team	Bureau of Land Management
Mason, Jerry	Public Involvement Coordinator	Forest Service, R-6
McDonald, Dennis	Forestry Coordinator	NW Indian Fisheries Commission
McMinds, Guys	Executive Office Advisor	Quinault Indian Nation
Nehlse, Willa	Biologist	Pacific Rivers Council
Ogden, Cay	Watershed Team	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Shaffer, Anne	Policy Analyst	Quileute Tribe
Sherer, Steve		Bonneville Power Administration
Smitch, Curt	Assistant Regional Director	U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Smith, Alexandra	Group Vice President	Bonneville Power Administration
Somers, Dave	Watershed Team	Bureau of Indian Affairs
Sprague, Lynn	Regional Forester	Forest Service, R-5
Tugel, Arlene	Assistant State Conservationist	Natural Resources Conservation Service
Warner, Bonita	Cultural Leader	Quileute Tribe