Regional Ecosystem Office
333 SW 1st P.O. Box 3623
Portland, Oregon 97208-3623
Website:
www.reo.gov E-Mail: reomail@or.blm.gov
Phone: 503-808-2165 FAX: 503-808-2163

 

Memorandum

Date:

February 1, 2007

To:

Gary Larsen, Supervisor, Mt. Hood National Forest

From:

/s/Anne Badgley, Executive Director

Subject:

Regional Ecosystem Office Review of 2007 Plantation Thinning Project on the Mt. Hood National Forest

Summary: The Regional Ecosystem Office (REO) interagency Late-Successional Reserve (LSR) Work Group has concluded its review of the documents provided by the Mt. Hood National Forest regarding proposed activities in LSRs within Alternative B of the 2007 Plantation Thinning Project Environmental Assessment (EA). The REO, based upon the review by the LSR Work Group, concurs with the Mt. Hood National Forest in its findings of consistency with the Standards and Guidelines (S&Gs) under Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP) for the 2007 Plantation Thinning Project.

Basis for the Review: Silviculture, risk reduction and salvage treatments in LSRs are subject to REO review under the NWFP S&Gs (C-12-15). As required by the NWFP S&G (C-11), the Mt. Hood National Forest prepared a Late-Successional Reserve Assessment (LSRA) for the North Willamette LSRs. The North Willamette LSRA was completed and reviewed by the REO in 1998. Projects within the LSRs covered by the assessment are exempted from further REO review provided they are consistent with the LSRA criteria and S&Gs. Activities which are not included in the LSRA or do not meet the treatment criteria identified in the assessment are subject to REO review.

Background and Project Description: The Mt. Hood National Forest is proposing commercial thinning in the Collawash and Roaring River LSRs. The thinnings are being designed to accelerate the development of mature and late-successional stand conditions, specifically habitat for northern spotted owls.

The LSR stands within the 2007 Plantation Thinning project occur within the Roaring River (207A) and Collawash (RO 210) LSRs and comprise approximately 955 and 354 acres, respectively. These stands are plantations between 32 and 61-years-old and are considered mid-seral stands. Canopy closure is 70 to 90 percent with relative densities greater than 70. All the units were originally clearcut back in the 1940’s to 1970’s. Few snags or residual trees were left in the stands after harvest. However, varying amounts of down woody debris remained post-harvest and were usually dependent on the type and success of site preparation techniques used during that time. Trees are beginning to experience growth suppression and some mortality is occurring; mainly in trees smaller than 10-inch d.b.h. In the Roaring River LSR, the quadratic mean diameter is 11-inches d.b.h. in the 32 to 49- year-old stands, and 14-inches d.b.h. in the 50 to 61-year-old stands. In the Collawash LSR the age of the stands vary from 40 to 50 years, and have a quadratic mean diameter of 13-inches d.b.h.

Stands will be heavily thinned to stimulate understory vegetation development. In treated stands, trees would be thinned to a relative density of 20- to 35-trees per acre. Trees would not be cut if they are greater than 20-inches in diameter (at a height of 4.5 feet). Hardwood trees across a range of size classes would be favored, including large trees that occupy mid-canopy and higher positions. Skips (no treatment pockets in the unit) would be created that would vary in size and would comprise a minimum of 10 percent of each unit. Skips would be 0.25 to 1.25 acres or larger where appropriate, based on site-specific features. Three to 10 percent of the resultant stand would be in heavily thinned patches (i.e., less than 50 trees per acre), or in openings up to one-quarter acre in size, to maximize individual tree development, encourage some understory vegetation development and the initiation of structural diversity.

The cost of creating or leaving down wood in the amounts recommended by the LSR assessment would not allow for an economically viable timber sale. No other funding source is available to implement the thinning project, thus without an economically viable timber sale the benefits gained in terms of accelerating the development of other late-successional characteristics would not be realized. Thus, the proposed thinning design will not meet the criteria in the North Willamette LSRA for down wood amounts – 10 to 15 percent cover within 5 years, and the Forest has brought the project to REO for review.

Review of the Project: The activities reviewed by the LSR Work Group were those proposed in LSRs under Alternative B of the EA: 2007 Plantation Thinning Project. The Work Group reviewed documents provided by the Mt. Hood National Forest, which included:

  1. 2007 Plantation Thin – LSR Portion, Clackamas River Ranger District, Mt. Hood National Forest, January 2007.
  2. Justification for Managing Below Levels of Down Woody Debris as Specified Within the North Willamette Late-Successional Reserve Assessment in the 2007 Plantation Thin, Mt. Hood National Forest, Clackamas River Ranger District, 1/23/07.

The Work Group’s review was based on the information within these documents and briefings. The interagency LSR Work Group review concluded that the proposed treatments in LSRs meet the objectives for managing LSRs. This conclusion was reached in part for the following reasons:

Conclusion: Based upon the interagency REO LSR Work Group’s review and conclusions, the REO concurs with the Mt. Hood National Forest’s conclusion that silviculture activities proposed in the 2007 Plantation Thinning Project are consistent with the NWFP S&Gs.

cc:
Gary Larsen, Forest Supervisor, Mt. Hood National Forest
Andrei Rykoff, District Ranger
Phil Mattson, FS
Cal Joyner, FS
Jim Rice, Team Lead, FS
LSR Work Group

 

2259/SM