Regional Ecosystem Office
333 SW 1st P.O. Box 3623
Portland, Oregon 97208-3623
Website:
www.reo.gov E-Mail: REOmail@or.blm.gov
Phone: 503-808-2165 FAX: 503-808-2163

Memorandum

Date:

September 25, 2003

To:

Regional Interagency Executive Committee (see attached distribution list)

From:

/s/ Anne Badgley, Executive Director

Subject:

REGIONAL INTERAGENCY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA & PREWORK - 8:00 - 2:00 p.m. – October 2, 2003

Enclosed please find an agenda for the October 2, 2003 Regional Interagency Executive Committee (RIEC) meeting which begins at 8:00 a.m. in the REO Conference Room and wraps up at 2:00 p.m.

Primary topics to be discussed at the meeting include:

As you can see, this will be a very interesting meeting and I look forward to seeing you. If you have any questions regarding this material, please contact your REO Representative, Kath Collier (503-808-2179), or me (503-808-2165).

Enclosures:
1 - Agenda and Pre-work for the October 2, 2003 meeting (5p)
2 - Regional MOU for the Northwest Forest Plan (6p)
3 - AFRC Settlement (18p)

cc: Presenters
REO Staff
Kathy Anderson, Region 5
PAC DFOs

1872/kc


RIEC Distribution List

Dave Allen, Fish & Wildlife Service
Dave Wesley (Alt)
Anne Badgley, Regional Ecosystem Office
Elaine M. Brong, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington
Judy Nelson (Alt)
Kent Connaughton, Forest Service Region 5
Kathy Anderson (Alt)
Linda Goodman, Forest Service Region 6
Jim Golden (Alt)
Bob Graham, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Dianne Guidry (Alt)
Col. Richard Hobernicht, US Army Corps of Engineers
Curt Loop (Alt)
Jon Jarvis, National Park Service
Jim Shevock (Alt)
Anne Kinsinger, Geological Survey, Western Region, Biological Resources Division
Dave Busch (Alt)
Robert Lohn, National Marine Fisheries Service
Mike Crouse (Alt)
Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, Environmental Protection Agency, Western Ecology Division
Dan McKenzie (Alt)
Michael J. Pool, Bureau of Land Management, California
Paul Roush (Alt)
Dave Powers, Environmental Protection Agency, R-10 OR Operations
Dan Opalski (Alt)
Tom Quigley, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Cindi West (Alt)
Stan Speaks, Bureau of Indian Affairs
Alex Whistler (Alt)
Steve Thompson, US Fish & Wildlife Service, California Nevada Operations Office
Phil Detrich/John Engbring (Alt)


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 1-1

Regional Interagency Executive Committee (RIEC)
October 2, 2003 – Meeting Agenda
Regional Ecosystem Office Conference Room, Portland, Oregon

Time

Topics

Purpose

Presenter

8:00

Welcome

  • Introductions, Recognition
    Agenda Review

 

Housekeeping

Linda Goodman
Facilitator

8:10

REO Transition/Interagency Coordination

  • Sign interagency MOU
  • Update on GIS/IT Decision

Decision/Direction

Anne Badgley
Lisa Freedman

8:30

Monitoring Program Activities & Interagency Budget

  • Results of Northern Spotted Owl Monitoring review

Decision/Direction

Jon Martin

9:00

AFRC Lawsuit Update

Update

Judy Nelson

9:20

NWFP Review in Region 5

  • Follow-up issues/actions

Discussion

Tom Quigley
Linda Goodman
Jack Blackwell

10:00

Break

   

10:15

NWFP Review (Continued)

   

12:00

Lunch

   

1:00

NWFP Review Executive Only Session

   

1:50

Closing/Wrap up

  • Agreements, tasks, & assignments review
  • Future meeting dates and topics

Housekeeping

Facilitator

2:00

Adjourn

   

RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 1-2

TOPIC: REO TRANSITION/INTERAGENCY COORDINATION

Presenter/Sponsor/Contact/Phone: Anne Badgley, REO Executive Director, 503-808-2165

Issue Statement: SIGNING THE INTERAGENCY REGIONAL MOU

Background: The RIEC has been working for several months to develop a new regional Memorandum of Understanding for the Northwest Forest Plan. In this meeting, our efforts will culminate in the signing of that agreement (which is attached for your information and review). No significant changes have been made to the MOU since the last review.

REO Staff Proposal: Please be prepared to sign, or give permission to affix an electronic signature for your agency.

Action Required:

Information xx Decision and signature

 

Issue Statement: UPDATE ON GIS/IT TRANSITION

Background: The responsibilities of the Geographical Information System staff within the Regional Ecosystem Office have shifted to the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management.

Analysis and Options: A brief update of the transition will be provided.

REO Staff Proposal: Some IAC members have voiced an interest in this issue. Suggest preparing an update on this topic for the November IAC meeting.

Action Required:

Information     xx Decision


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 1-3

TOPIC: MONITORING BUDGET REVIEW AND PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

Presenter/Sponsor: Lisa Freedman (503-808-2271); Jon Martin (503-808-2269)

REO Contact/Phone: Dave Busch (503-808-2192)

Issue Statement: This presentation will cover three related topics:

  • Results of review of northern spotted owl (NSO) program.
  • MPM recommendation on future monitoring of spotted owls.
  • Request RIEC concurrence on MPM recommendation.

Over $25 million dollars will have been invested in monitoring the NSO through the first ten years of implementing the NWFP. In light of declining agency budgets, added monitoring requirements, and the experience from the first ten years of implementing the NWFP, it is timely to revisit the continued commitment to NSO monitoring (about $2.5M per year).

Background: In September 2001, the RIEC decided to fully fund NSO monitoring through FY02 and FY03 completing a full decade of NSO monitoring. It was understood at the September RIEC meeting that a review would be conducted to look at ways to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of monitoring activities during the second decade. This review is now complete.

The RIEC also directed the monitoring staff to pursue development of partnership opportunities with the three States and other Federal agencies, as a way to improve coverage and efficiency of the Watershed Monitoring Program (AREMP). This developing State-Federal partnership was well received by the IAC at their August 6 meeting. While there have been significant improvements in the ability to share watershed monitoring information, AREMP has yet to achieve full implementation due to funding limitations.

Analysis and Options: Findings of the NSO module review included:

  • NSO research and monitoring programs have generated as complete a set of data and analyses as any available for a listed species.
  • NSO population data, in addition to habitat data, are required regardless of proposed changes to NSO plan components.

The review team focused on NSO population monitoring and offered seven alternatives to the Monitoring Program Managers (MPM). The annual cost of these alternatives range from $443K to $9.8M. Six of the seven alternatives proposed would implement a random survey methodology for monitoring the NSO population.

Review team members favored changing the current approach for various reasons:

  • Reduce costs.
  • Improve the statistical reliability.
  • Expand the coverage to the entire range.
  • Add information on habitat and barred owls from throughout the NSO’s range.

Recommendations: The MPM recommends that the RIEC revisit the NSO program next fall when the following products/activities have been completed:


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 1-4

  • USFWS 5-year status review completed (May 2004).
  • Consultation Needs Assessment completed in FY04.
  • 10-year monitoring-evaluation report completed in December 04.
  • Proposed operational test of the new random-grid survey technique.

Organizational/Funding Implications: The MPM agreed that changes to the NSO module at this time may:

  • Increase risk to timber program.
  • Weaken ability to change NSO components of the plan.
  • Potentially impact agencies’ credibility.
  • Have less support of NSO scientific community.
  • Potentially jeopardize our ability to fulfill the AREMP goals.

Staff Proposal: Extend the NSO budget commitment another year and revisit the entire interagency monitoring program in the Fall of 2004 to review budget requirements and impacts of the various activities above.

Action Required:

Information xx Decision

Topic: American Forest Resources Council, et al. Settlement

Presenter/Sponsor: Judy Nelson, BLM

REO Contact/Phone: Debbie Pietrzak (Pat Geehan acting), 503-808-6006

Issue Statement: The American Forest Resources Council (AFRC), et al. litigation involving the Northwest Forest Plan was recently settled. This presentation will highlight key points of the settlement.

Action Required:

xx Information Decision


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 1-5

TOPIC: NWFP REVIEW IN REGION 5

Presenter/Sponsor: Tom Quigley, Linda Goodman, and Jack Blackwell

REO Contact/Phone: Shawne Mohoric, 503-808-2175

Issue Statement: Discussion of potential actions to improve NWFP implementation

Background: Regional Forester, Jack Blackwell, shared results from a Region 5 review of NWFP implementation at the last RIEC and IAC meetings. Executives from the land management agencies and research stations met recently to discuss potential opportunities for making further improvements. Their ideas, along with others suggested by RIEC members at this meeting, will be discussed. Suggested discussion topics include:

  1. Opportunities for expanding use of programmatic consultations
  2. Research findings that may assist in identifying actions for improvements
  3. Expanding counterpart regulations for conducting consultation
  4. Moving forward with meeting conditions of the new settlement agreement and associated management implications

A list of NWFP issues and actions has been updated and included with the pre-work materials to provide general background information for this discussion. A copy of the AFRC settlement agreement is included for your information and review.

REO Staff Proposal: The goal of this discussion will be to identify future potential actions, identify next steps, and identify what role the RIEC would like the IAC to play in this discussion.

Action Required:

Information xx Decision


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 2-1

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

FOR MANAGEMENT UNDER THE NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN

AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL

I. PARTIES

This is an understanding among the following parties:

USDI, Bureau of Indian Affairs
USDI, Bureau of Land Management
US Environmental Protection Agency
USEPA, Western Ecology Division
USDA, Forest Service
USDA, Forest Service, Research

USDOC, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service
USDI, National Park Service
USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Army Corps of Engineers
USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service
USDI, Geological Survey

II. BACKGROUND

In 1993, a comprehensive Northwest Forest Plan was initiated to end the impasse over management of Federal forest land in the Pacific Northwest within the range of the northern spotted owl. With the signing of the Northwest Forest Plan Record of Decision in 1994, a framework and a system of Standards and Guidelines were established, using a new ecosystem approach to address resource management. By taking an innovative approach based on ecosystem and watershed management, while also addressing economic and social impacts, the Northwest Forest Plan transcends traditional administrative boundaries. Successful implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan has required and continues to require unprecedented cooperation, coordination, and collaboration, among the participating Federal agencies and with States, Tribes, and local governments. This collaboration must continue.

III. PURPOSE

The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding is to establish and maintain an interagency framework to achieve two distinct goals. The first goal is cooperative planning, improved decision-making, and coordinated implementation of the forest ecosystem management component of the Northwest Forest Plan on Federal lands within the range of the northern spotted owl. The second goal is improved coordination and collaboration with State, Tribal, and local governments as they seek to implement management approaches that support or complement the goals of the Northwest Forest Plan. Fulfillment of both of these goals is integral to an ecosystem management approach that is scientifically sound, ecologically credible, and legally responsible.

Signatories to this Memorandum of Understanding agree to:

• Continue to refine and implement a cohesive vision and shared sense of mission for the management of Federal forest lands that balances multiple objectives, including the restoration


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 2-2

and conservation of forest ecosystems and the production of sustainable economic and social benefits from the forests;

• Improve their ability to monitor and evaluate their progress toward established goals, and to adapt to change, as appropriate, in a cohesive manner;

• Cultivate greater trust, coordination, and collaboration among Federal agencies, within individual agencies, and with State, Tribal, and local governments;

• Integrate the best scientific information available from research and monitoring into adaptive management decisions;

• Continue work toward building a seamless, current, and accessible information network to support ecosystem management on federal lands;

• Share information, technology, and expertise, and pool resources, in order to make and implement better-informed decisions related to ecosystem and adaptive management across jurisdictional boundaries;

• Improve integrated application of agency budgets to maximize efficient use of funds toward the Northwest Forest Plan effort;

• Coordinate Northwest Forest Plan activities with related or complementary efforts of State, Tribal, and local governments;

• Coordinate the ecosystem management aspects of Northwest Forest Plan implementation with related or complementary socio-economic opportunities at appropriate scales including the community level.

IV. STRUCTURE

The following interagency groups will continue to develop, monitor, and oversee the implementation of comprehensive forest management strategy for Federal forests within the range of the northern spotted owl. They will support the development, implementation, and periodic adjustment of land and resource management plans of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. This agreement does not substitute for or alter the line authority of individual agencies.

It is the intent of this Memorandum of Understanding to describe the functions of only the primary coordination structures, with the understanding that the Federal agencies may establish additional coordination mechanisms, and modify existing ones, as needed.

This Memorandum of Understanding is intended to enable and encourage the signatory agencies to be creative and to consider a full range of approaches to achieve intergovernmental cooperation and collaboration in support of the Northwest Forest Plan.

A. Regional Interagency Executive Committee: The Regional Interagency Executive Committee will serve as the senior regional entity to ensure the prompt, coordinated, and successful implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan at the regional level, including ecosystem-scale monitoring and adaptive management.


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 2-3

The Regional Interagency Executive Committee may alter its membership if it so chooses, and in appropriate situations, it will consult with other Federal agencies, and State, Tribal, and local governments.

The chair of the Regional Interagency Executive Committee will alternate between the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management representatives.

The Regional Interagency Executive Committee will seek advice from the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee, constituted under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, regarding implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan on Federal land, and will coordinate with the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee for better integration of forest ecosystem management activities among Federal and non-Federal governmental entities across jurisdictional boundaries.

The Regional Interagency Executive Committee may, at its discretion, refer issues to the Interagency Steering Committee for coordination or resolution.

The Regional Interagency Executive Committee may conduct periodic reviews of interagency groups and structures and implement appropriate changes.

B. Intergovernmental Advisory Committee: The role of the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee is to advise the Regional Interagency Executive Committee regarding implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan on Federal lands and to provide a forum for better integration of forest ecosystem management activities among Federal and non-Federal governmental entities across jurisdictional boundaries.

The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Chair and members of the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee will be as described in the charter for the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee.

The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee may establish such working groups or subcommittees as it may find necessary. These working groups or subcommittees may include, consistent with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, representatives of non-governmental organizations that have an interest in the implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan.

The Regional Interagency Executive Committee will periodically review and evaluate the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee role and charter and make recommendations on re-chartering to the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

C. Regional Ecosystem Office: The Regional Ecosystem Office serves as a staff office for, and acts under the direction of, the regional executives acting as a collective body through the Regional Interagency Executive Committee.

In support of implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan, and pursuant to an annual work plan developed in conjunction with the Regional Interagency Executive Committee, the Regional Ecosystem Office will:

• Be responsible for developing, evaluating, and recommending resolution of consistency and implementation issues assigned by the Regional Interagency Executive Committee;


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 2-4

• Facilitate coordination among, and/or provide support to, various interagency work groups such as those involving late-successional reserve management, survey and manage, geographic information systems and monitoring;

• Facilitate periodic evaluation by the Regional Interagency Executive Committee of the interagency structure described in this section, and recommend modifications to the Regional Interagency Executive Committee as needed to improve interagency coordination and collaboration, adapt interagency structures to changing needs, and reflect progress in Northwest Forest Plan implementation;

• Facilitate staff support to the operations of the Regional Interagency Executive Committee and the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee;

• Provide, at the direction of the Regional Interagency Executive Committee, information sharing and support for activities at the province level.

D. Research and Monitoring Group: The Research and Monitoring Group represents the Research Executives in presenting an independent science perspective in intergovernmental forums. The Research and Monitoring Group facilitates intergovernmental activities to accomplish the following goals:

• Scientific research on fundamental questions underlying basic assumptions of the Northwest Forest Plan;
• Development of research and monitoring plans;
• Communication of scientific findings, technical transfer, and opportunities to facilitate adaptive management;
• Independent scientific review, evaluation, and analysis.

The Research and Monitoring Group is comprised of scientists, or designated representatives as assigned by Research Agency Executives, to represent the research agencies. The scientists and representatives will convene meetings, work groups, standing or ad hoc committees, etc., to carry out assignments on an as-needed basis. The Group is responsible to the Research Executives for science findings, interpretations, recommendations, and advice. The Group also works with members of the Regional Interagency Executive Committee to facilitate the integration and interface between science and management. In those situations, the Group continues to be responsible to the Research Executives but coordinates with the Regional Interagency Executive Committee through the Regional Ecosystem Office.

E. Interorganizational Resource Information Coordinating Committee: The Interorganizational Resource Information Coordinating Committee, a subcommittee of the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee, will be used to provide advice and assistance to the agencies in developing a seamless and accessible information network to support ecosystem management. The Interorganizational Resource Information Coordinating Committee will be used to help identify key data sets and standards; and make recommendations to the agencies on data management priorities, applications, data maintenance protocols and stewardship of regional data.


RIEC October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 2-5

F. Province-Level Organizations: The Provincial Interagency Executive Committees will serve as the senior provincial entities to ensure the prompt, coordinated, and successful implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan at the province level.

  1. Provincial Interagency Executive Committees: Provincial Interagency Executive Committees will be established for the provinces to support the successful implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan at the province level, under the general direction of the Regional Interagency Executive Committee. Each Provincial Interagency Executive Committee may, under guidance from the Regional Interagency Executive Committee, undertake specific activities within its province, including but not limited to:
  2. • Coordinating landscape analyses to assess the health and condition of watersheds and to consider socio-economic conditions in local communities;

    • Sharing information to support better decisions regarding the health of the ecosystem, including watersheds and local communities;

    • Identifying mutual goals, objectives, and priorities to support coordinated watershed restoration and conservation strategies;

    • Sharing technology and expertise within the province;

    • Coordinating and conducting monitoring within the province;

    • Encouraging complementary ecosystem management among Federal and non-Federal landowners;

    • Coordinating ecosystem management activities in concert with Federal, State, Tribal, and local programs for economic, labor, and community assistance.

  3. Provincial Advisory Committees: The role of the Provincial Advisory Committees is to advise the Provincial Interagency Executive Committees regarding implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan on Federal lands and to provide a forum for better integration of forest ecosystem management activities across jurisdictional boundaries at the province level.

Membership will include representatives of Federal, State, local and Tribal governments, and a variety of other interests as described in the Provincial Advisory Committee Charter. Provincial Advisory Committees shall make recommendations to Federal agencies through the Provincial Interagency Executive Committees regarding RIEC coordination and implementation of ecosystem strategies pursuant to the Northwest Forest Plan. They shall also participate, where appropriate, in collaborative planning at the province level across Federal and non-Federal boundaries. In appropriate cases, Provincial Interagency Executive Committees may find it desirable to use mechanisms other than, or in addition to, Provincial Advisory Committees in order to obtain advice from non-Federal entities.

The Provincial Advisory Committees' role and charter will be periodically reviewed and evaluated in coordination with the Provincial Interagency Executive Committees. Recommendations for re-chartering the committees will be made to the Secretary of Agriculture under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.


October 2, 2003 Prework - Attachment 2-6

V. TERM

The term of this agreement is five years from the date of execution. Each agency’s participation in this agreement shall be subject to the availability of funds. The Regional Interagency Executive Committee will consider annually whether modifications to this agreement are appropriate.

DAVID B. ALLEN
Regional Director, Region 1
USDI, Fish and Wildlife Service

Date:

JONATHAN B. JARVIS
Regional Director
USDI, National Park Service

 

Date:

ELAINE M. BRONG
State Director
USDI, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington

Date:

ANNE KINSINGER
Regional Biologist
USDI, Geological Survey-BRD, Western Regional Office

 

Date:

LINDA GOODMAN
Regional Forester
USDA, Forest Service, Region 6

Date:

THOMAS M. QUIGLEY
Station Director
USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station

 

Date:

DAVID POWERS
Forest Team Director
USEPA, Region 10 Oregon Operations

 

Date:

JENNIFER ORME-ZAVALETA
Associate Director
Environmental Protection Agency, Western Ecology Division

 

Date:

COL. RICHARD W. HOBERNICHT
District Engineer, Portland District
US Army Corps of Engineers

Date:

ROBERT GRAHAM
State Conservationist-Oregon
USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service

 

Date:

D. ROBERT LOHN
Regional Administrator
USDOC, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service

 

Date:

STANLEY SPEAKS
Regional Director
USDI, Bureau of Indian Affairs

Date: